Comments on: SolrJ TermsComponent Support http://www.mattweber.org/2009/04/30/solrj-termscomponent-support/ Python, Search, and Open Source. Wed, 05 May 2010 22:07:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: matt http://www.mattweber.org/2009/04/30/solrj-termscomponent-support/comment-page-1/#comment-20682 matt Wed, 05 May 2010 22:04:27 +0000 http://www.mattweber.org/?p=124#comment-20682 This patch has been accepted and applied in the latest version of Solr trunk. I would use that version. This patch has been accepted and applied in the latest version of Solr trunk. I would use that version.

]]> By: nabil rabhi http://www.mattweber.org/2009/04/30/solrj-termscomponent-support/comment-page-1/#comment-20290 nabil rabhi Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:03:40 +0000 http://www.mattweber.org/?p=124#comment-20290 hi Matt, I tired to apply your patch SOLR-1139.patch on the solr 1.4 but I got some errors during the operation. here what the error generated by the patch command looks like: patch -p0 -i SOLR-1139.patch can't find file to patch at input line 5 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: CHANGES.txt |=================================================================== |--- CHANGES.txt (revision 889975) |+++ CHANGES.txt (working copy) -------------------------- File to patch: Skip this patch? [y] y Skipping patch. 5 out of 5 hunks ignored when I use the command patch -p0 -i SOLR-1139.patch I get this error: patching file CHANGES.txt Hunk #1 FAILED at 58. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file CHANGES.txt.rej patching file src/test/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrQueryTest.java Hunk #1 FAILED at 143. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/test/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrQueryTest.java.rej patching file src/test/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/response/TermsResponseTest.java patching file src/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrQuery.java Hunk #1 FAILED at 22. Hunk #2 FAILED at 55. 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrQuery.java.rej patching file src/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/response/QueryResponse.java Hunk #1 FAILED at 46. Hunk #2 FAILED at 60. Hunk #3 FAILED at 122. Hunk #4 FAILED at 133. Hunk #5 FAILED at 288. 5 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/response/QueryResponse.java.rej patching file src/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/response/TermsResponse.java can you help me please solve this problem? PS: I'm using ubuntu 9.10 hi Matt,
I tired to apply your patch SOLR-1139.patch on the solr 1.4 but I got some errors during the operation.
here what the error generated by the patch command looks like:
patch -p0 -i SOLR-1139.patch

can’t find file to patch at input line 5
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or –strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
————————–
|Index: CHANGES.txt
|===================================================================
|— CHANGES.txt (revision 889975)
|+++ CHANGES.txt (working copy)
————————–
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y] y
Skipping patch.
5 out of 5 hunks ignored

when I use the command patch -p0 -i SOLR-1139.patch

I get this error:

patching file CHANGES.txt
Hunk #1 FAILED at 58.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED — saving rejects to file CHANGES.txt.rej
patching file src/test/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrQueryTest.java
Hunk #1 FAILED at 143.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED — saving rejects to file src/test/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrQueryTest.java.rej
patching file src/test/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/response/TermsResponseTest.java
patching file src/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrQuery.java
Hunk #1 FAILED at 22.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 55.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED — saving rejects to file src/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrQuery.java.rej
patching file src/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/response/QueryResponse.java
Hunk #1 FAILED at 46.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 60.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 122.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 133.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 288.
5 out of 5 hunks FAILED — saving rejects to file src/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/response/QueryResponse.java.rej
patching file src/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/response/TermsResponse.java

can you help me please solve this problem?
PS: I’m using ubuntu 9.10

]]> By: matt http://www.mattweber.org/2009/04/30/solrj-termscomponent-support/comment-page-1/#comment-20153 matt Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:42:12 +0000 http://www.mattweber.org/?p=124#comment-20153 Yes, version 0.2.0 supports creating your own results page. Just create a s4w_search.php based on the one included with the plugin. Unfortunately, there are some hardcoded values inside the plugin itself, however, the next version provides a fix for this. Yes, version 0.2.0 supports creating your own results page. Just create a s4w_search.php based on the one included with the plugin. Unfortunately, there are some hardcoded values inside the plugin itself, however, the next version provides a fix for this.

]]> By: Marc http://www.mattweber.org/2009/04/30/solrj-termscomponent-support/comment-page-1/#comment-19610 Marc Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:48:55 +0000 http://www.mattweber.org/?p=124#comment-19610 It would be really useful if TermsComponent was also available through SolrNet. Looks like a mini project for me... It would be really useful if TermsComponent was also available through SolrNet.

Looks like a mini project for me…

]]> By: matt http://www.mattweber.org/2009/04/30/solrj-termscomponent-support/comment-page-1/#comment-15941 matt Mon, 18 May 2009 13:24:23 +0000 http://www.mattweber.org/?p=124#comment-15941 TermsComponent is not in Solr 1.3. You need to apply this patch to the latest trunk version of Solr 1.4 for this functionality. TermsComponent is not in Solr 1.3. You need to apply this patch to the latest trunk version of Solr 1.4 for this functionality.

]]> By: Daniel http://www.mattweber.org/2009/04/30/solrj-termscomponent-support/comment-page-1/#comment-15940 Daniel Mon, 18 May 2009 13:22:49 +0000 http://www.mattweber.org/?p=124#comment-15940 Great!!! but how can it works in current example Solr 1.3. Great!!! but how can it works in current example Solr 1.3.

]]>